The Verge's Jess Weatherbed tested Adobe's Firefly AI Assistant in beta, describing it as a conversational AI agent that operates Adobe's design apps rather than generating images directly. Weatherbed found the assistant's explanations of its edits impressive but was unimpressed by the actual results, noting it feels like a multitasking middleman that removes some busywork while keeping the user in creative control.
the verge tried adobe's new firefly ai assistant beta. it's a bot that uses adobe apps for you instead of making images itself. the assistant talks a good game about how it edits, but the results are mid. basically a design intern who explains things well but delivers meh work.
Adobe's approach to AI assistants represents a shift from fully automated generation to tools that augment existing workflows, which could redefine how creatives interact with design software. If successful, it may set a new standard for AI integration in professional creative tools, balancing automation with user control. However, the mediocre results in beta suggest the technology still has a long way to go before it becomes truly useful for professionals.
adobe is betting that creatives want an ai assistant that does the boring stuff but lets them stay in charge. if it works, it could change how we use design software. but right now it's giving 'helpful intern who still needs handholding' — not quite ready for prime time.
Public story text does not change until an admin approves it.
Looped stories are not disposable posts: receipts, claims, reader checks, and moderator decisions can change the approved version over time.